Verified by experiment
relevance
Knowledge must be validated by practice
Ideas are hypotheses and must be tested by implementation
Ideas that are not validated by action have no value.
I don't use experiment and practice very differently.
Similar genres to [mounting
action seems a little more abstract.
Some of the behaviors don't make sense experimentally.
I don't expect unknown experiences when I take a bath every night.
May try new bath salts, this is an experiment
uncertainty is the difference between having
Between Verified by experiment and Verified by practice, I would venture to say that "Verified by experiment" has a higher degree of nuance in terms of the objective of verification itself.
I wonder if I'll ever require the reader to capture that nuance.
I wrote that I "don't use much distinction between experiment and practice," and after a while the thought emerged as "I dare say there is a little difference, not equal."
from prediction model
Whether this specific prediction is correct or not is [* verified by experimentation
When it is predicted that some action will yield a beneficial result, it is practiced (here), and if the prediction is correct, a beneficial result is yielded and gained, and if the prediction is not, an opportunity to improve the prediction model is yielded and gained.
When I wrote up to (here), I was aware that I had chosen "practice" when I wrote up to
Similar genres to social implementation and [user test
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/実験によって検証 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.